While shipping a gauzy, light, and insignificant laptop is at ease on your back, there’s something to subsist assumed on behalf of having all the conveniences of a desktop PC with you wherever you quit. Working on a hefty screen with discrete graphics, and having an optical drive and a vast arduous drive by the side of your disposal—as well such as lots of ports and a amount pad, depending on what did you say? You spend your laptop for—are not right facilities. On behalf of particular population, these skin texture are tremendous productivity boosters.
The trick is balancing folks items with a notebook body burden that’s manageable—and that’s rebuff at ease design succinct. But Samsung seems to undergo pulled it inedible in the sphere of its progression 7 Chronos. This laptop, right a little feathers over 5 pounds in the sphere of the replica we tested, overheads $999 to $1,299, depending on the configuration. It’s a well-endowed, consumer-oriented powerhouse.
Whichever progression 7 replica you may possibly subsist looking by the side of, this peppy laptop preference undergo single of Intel’s fast center i7 processors, a good-size (15.6-inch, 1,600×900-resolution) screen, a fanatical AMD graphics engine, lots of RAM, and a hefty arduous drive. The replica we tested bowed in the sphere of effective performance on our yardstick tests, plus our tough battery-life test. Our just complaint is with the aim of it has a somewhat original come into contact with pad, which we were able to correct by adjusting its sensitivity.
You can bad deal the 15.6-inch progression 7 Chronos in the sphere of single of three configurations. The $999 heart configuration comes with the Intel center i7-2675QM computer, 6GB of RAM, a 750GB arduous drive, an AMD Xeymour HD 6490M graphics hew, and Windows 7 land of your birth Premium. The subsequently replica up, by the side of $1,149, is configured similarly, bar with the aim of the arduous drive has 8GB of ExpressCache (more vis-а-vis with the aim of in the sphere of the skin texture section) and an AMD Radeon HD 6750M graphics hew. Near is additionally a 14-ich progression 7 Chronos, which comes with a center i5 2430M computer, 6GB of RAM, and Windows 7 land of your birth Premium on behalf of $1,099.
The top-dog $1,299 replica is the single we tested. It’s configured right like the $1,149 replica, bar with the aim of you acquire 8GB of RAM and Windows 7 trained. The AMD Radeon HD 6750M with the aim of it comes with is a much beefier graphics computer than the heart model’s Radeon HD 6490M, too, with twice the onboard capture on tape RAM (1GB) and superior ratings in the sphere of many basis areas. On behalf of exemplar, the HD 6750M ropes 480 brook handing out units, compared with the HD 6490M’s 160. (Stream processors complete a vast share of the genuine screen rendering.) While this may possibly subsist the nearly everyone expensive item of the Chronos slice, it did release first-rate performance on behalf of the money and a slice of cherish. Here’s why.
Such as consumer models quit, the progression 7 Chronos is a strapping machinery. Our $1,299 test item, such as we illustrious earlier, came with the 2.2GHz Intel center i7-2675QM quad-core computer and handed inedible its intensive graphics handing out to an AMD Radeon HD 6750M graphics accelerator with 1GB of its own remembrance. The quad-core power works was serviced by 8GB of RAM and a 750GB arduous drive. Overall, this configuration performed well on our yardstick tests, outperforming many of the mainstream models we’ve tested lately.
On behalf of exemplar, compared with Acer’s competing $1,399 Ethos Aspire 5951G-9694, which uses the to some extent faster-clocked (2.3GHz) center i7-2630QM computer, an Nvidia GeForce GT 555M graphics accelerator, and 6GB of RAM, the progression 7 Chronos performed quite well. It additionally matched up personally to Sony’s $1,149 VAIO F progression, a media-consumption machinery with a 16.4-inch screen and based on Intel’s 2.2GHz center i7-2670QM computer, Nvidia GeForce GT 540M graphics, and 4GB of RAM. Despite the much less significant complement of RAM, the Sony replica performed very close to the progression 7 Chronos on nearly everyone of our tests, and by the side of time beating it.
On behalf of order, the progression 7 Chronos scored 7,860 on our overall system-performance test, PCMark Vantage. All three models beat the current common result with mainstream laptops with the aim of we’ve calculated on this test (6,149), but oddly, the cheaper the notebook in the sphere of this trio, the better the result. The $1,149 VAIO scored the top (8,208) while the $1,399 Aspire scored the lowest (7,273).
The same distribution of results came up on our Cinebench 10 test, which stresses all CPU cores. Our Samsung Chronos test item bowed in the sphere of an impressive 17,832 on this test, which is single of the highest showings we’ve seen in the sphere of a laptop, though not superior than the VAIO F Series’ result of 18,157. By the side of 15,533, the Ethos Aspire fell to the back of the rucksack on one occasion again. All three notebooks, however, handily beat the 9,851 common with mainstream laptops we’ve tested.
All three systems are built on behalf of media playback and crunching, and it showed in the sphere of the tests we ran with the aim of stressed folks tasks. All three converted our sound and capture on tape archive by the side of exceptional speeds. On our Windows Media Encoder test, in the sphere of which we encode a 3-minute-and-15-second (3:15) capture on tape clip to a DVD-friendly format, the progression 7 Chronos converted the rub in the sphere of an imposingly fast 2:14; with the aim of attached with the Aspire and was a trivial slower than the VAIO F progression (at 2:06). On our iTunes Conversion Test, in the sphere of which we convert 11 standard MP3 tracks to AAC format, all of the systems performed splendidly and—finally—fell in the sphere of line according to their prices. The Aspire was the quickest (2:36), followed by the progression 7 Chronos (2:49) and the VAIO F progression (3:06). All told, the computer power at this point is effective on behalf of media-crunching tasks.
However, the precise tweaks with the aim of companies bring in to their laptops provide variability—for better or else worse—in these notebooks. Their processors are not identical, and their graphics cards, while not the focus of these tests, complete make a payment to the anecdotal scores, but the floor line at this point is with the aim of Samsung is only if a well-balanced machinery. While it in no way ranked head in the sphere of these tests, it in no way ranked survive, either, which cannot subsist assumed vis-а-vis the Sony VAIO and Acer Ethos Aspire laptops.